Previous by DateNext by Date Date Index & Search
Previous by ThreadNext by Thread Thread Index & Search
LM_NET Archive



I am currently marking some uni papers  that focus on the use of webquests and time 
and again, I am
getting quotes from various sources that are suggesting that to save time in 
developing an original
webquest, teachers should adapt one that already exists in order to meet their 
needs. 

Every time I read this I cringe because surely such an adaptation would be an 
infringement of
intellectual property.  Personally, I would be very ticked off if I spent hours 
developing a
webquest - and I mean one in the true meaning of the concept,  not a low-level 
online
information-gathering exercise - and then found someone "adapted" it without 
permission.

What do you think?  Am I being pedantic, or mean and miserable?  I am really 
interested in your
views because this IP issue is important to me.
Barbara

Barbara Braxton
Teacher Librarian
PALMERSTON ACT 2913
AUSTRALIA

E. barbara@iimetro.com.au
"Together we learn from each other." 

--------------------------------------------------------------------
Please note: All LM_NET postings are protected by copyright law.
  You can prevent most e-mail filters from deleting LM_NET postings
  by adding LM_NET@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU to your e-mail address book.
To change your LM_NET status, e-mail to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu
In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET  2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL
 3) SET LM_NET MAIL  4) SET LM_NET DIGEST  * Allow for confirmation.
 * LM_NET Help & Information: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/
 * LM_NET Archive: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/archive/
 * EL-Announce with LM_NET Select: http://lm-net.info/
 * LM_NET Supporters: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ven.html
 * LM_NET Wiki: http://lmnet.wikispaces.com/
--------------------------------------------------------------------

LM_NET Mailing List Home