A few weeks ago I was informed that my library book money for this year and
next was to be redistributed to each classroom to purchase about 3000.00 worth
of books for each of the 9 classrooms grades 3-5 in our elementary. After
some angst, a meeting was set up with the literacy coordinator for the program
and principal, superintendent, treasurer (the usual suspects). I found the
meeting very disturbing. So I am asking the collective intelligence for
input. I will certainly post a hit but I think at some point it really needs
to be a discussion for everyone in the School Library Community.
The litracy coordinator explained that the program would place extensive
classroom libraries in each classroom. Her reasons were the ususal. Too
difficult for teacher to get students in on a flexible schedule, not enough
books, some personality problems with aides, I am sure many of you have heard
them all. I tried to counter each point with a counter point. Although we are
a fixed scheduled school I was willing to double up classess so that the
majority of the day would be flexible scheduled. I pointed out that classroom
libraries become stale very quickly, theft and loss are greater, genere is not
a good way to organize a large quantity of books and of course, you also know
all the counter points.
Here is what I find disturbing. I did some research on the literacy
collaborative movement. It really does leave the school library out of the
loop! I ask the everyone i the meeting how you could have any literacy
movement in a school district and leave the library out of the loop? The
literacy collaborative is being supported by some major universities including
Ohio State. I tried point out that the school library is the literacy center
of a school. But this program ignores the school library. How could our
national organization allow a major literacy inititive to ignore the school
library.
Maybe I have misinterpreted the program from it's website and maybe this
teacher has misinterpreted the program. But given the number of postings about
setting up libraries by genre and/or level (a major practice with literacy
collaborative) I have to wonder what's going on? Should I be concerned? How
many other literacy inititive have done the same? And with all the state
studies out about the efficacy of school libraries why aren't we seen as the
literacy centers of the school? Shouldn't AASL be on top of this trend and be
contacting these groups to integrate to make sure the school library is seen
as a major player in literacy improvement?
Becky Vasilakis
District Library Media Specialist
Amanda Clearcreek School District
Amanda OH
rshull@greenapple.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Please note: All LM_NET postings are protected by copyright law.
You can prevent most e-mail filters from deleting LM_NET postings
by adding LM_NET@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU to your e-mail address book.
To change your LM_NET status, e-mail to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu
In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL
3) SET LM_NET MAIL 4) SET LM_NET DIGEST * Allow for confirmation.
* LM_NET Help & Information: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/
* LM_NET Archive: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/archive/
* EL-Announce with LM_NET Select: http://elann.biglist.com/sub/
* LM_NET Supporters: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ven.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------
LM_NET
Mailing List Home