- To: LM_NET@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
- Subject: Re: [LM_NET] should students use Wikipedia as a source?
- From: Ann Ewbank <Ann.Ewbank@ASU.EDU>
- Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 07:27:19 -0700
- Approved-By: peterm@IIS.SYR.EDU
- Reply-To: Ann Ewbank <Ann.Ewbank@ASU.EDU>
- Sender: School Library Media & Network Communications <LM_NET@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>
- Thread-Index: AcekWPXSe1GK+i+USPWy1Zy3qy3dmQ==
- Thread-Topic: should students use Wikipedia as a source?
Colleagues,
With permission, I am forwarding the following message from Bruce Fulton, Outreach
Librarian for the Univiersity of Arizona School of Information Resources and
Library Science, where I initiated the same discussion on the AASL Forum:
With all due respect, and I mean that sincerely, I don't think we can afford to be
complacent about the changes that are occurring in online ready reference and the
profound impact the read/write web has on our understanding of how information is
mediated. Authority is important and students need to understand it. But it may not
always be the best or only way to evaluate information resources.
Tomorrow, 5/31/2007 is a blue moon, say some. That would be the second full moon in
a calendar month, according to conventional wisdom.
Today on NPR, I heard that Sky and Telescope finally 'fessed up about their
complicity in fostering this wrong notion about the meaning of 'blue moon.' They
tracked it back to an article originally published in Sky and Telescope that
referenced an authoritative source (meaning that the sources were identified and
deemed authoritative) dating to 1985. Sky and Telescope now spin it this way,
"Where the authors, Margo McLoone-Basta and Alice Siegel, got it, no one seemed to
know. Used in this way, the term was certainly very, very local before they
included it in their book. It seemed never to have been written down before. Of
course, authors sometimes "invent" information to protect themselves against
plagiarists. Well, if that were the case they'd already lost, because the new "blue
Moon" almost immediately entered the folklore of the modern world. It became as
living a meaning as any of its predecessors."
Today alone, the Wikipedia article on Blue Moon [astronomical phenomenon] has been
updated nearly a dozen times to reflect the new information. The article provides
original source links to today's Sky and Telescope printed retraction and other
sources reflecting scholars' interpretations of the phrase. There are a dozen
citations and external links.
In contrast, searching Blue Moon in the University of Arizona's very expensive and
restricted subscription to the Academic Edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica
references 94 articles on the query, none of which has anything to do with the blue
moon topic in question. Restricting it to the phrase "blue moon" narrows the field
to 13, not a single one of which is relevant. Linked articles to the phrase range
from "beer" to "Mel Torme" to "Credence Clearwater Revival."
Telling students to "just say no" to Wikipedia does as much good as telling them to
just say no to sex or drugs. They're perfectly capable of looking up Blue Moon both
in Wikipedia and EB, and they will. We can peer down disapprovingly of their
naiveté and insist on academic purity, but I think we owe them better than that. If
we don't address the current environment honestly, take the time to understand it
ourselves, and work with students to help them navigate it confidently,
appropriately and with the requisite skepticism, we've failed.
Students today need to deal with a sea change in how information is collected,
stored and accessed. As educators and information specialists, we need to mediate,
not castigate. Authority is only one metric used to evaluate information resources.
Today's students are tomorrow's information workers who will be using wikis and
other community-based information resources and collaborative software along with
both traditional and 21 st century tools to build the next generation of
information resources.
Let's make sure we provide them with the analytical and higher order thinking
skills to manage and use them effectively and work with them to bring them to a
level of competence as knowledgeable consumers and creators of society's archive.
Bruce Fulton, MLS
Ann
Ann Dutton Ewbank, Ph.D.
President, Arizona Library Association
Education Liaison Librarian
Fletcher Library
Arizona State University at the West campus
P.O. Box 37100
Phoenix, Arizona 85069-7100
602.543.8527
Fax 602.543.6500
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Please note: All LM_NET postings are protected by copyright law.
You can prevent most e-mail filters from deleting LM_NET postings
by adding LM_NET@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU to your e-mail address book.
To change your LM_NET status, e-mail to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu
In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL
3) SET LM_NET MAIL 4) SET LM_NET DIGEST * Allow for confirmation.
* LM_NET Help & Information: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/
* LM_NET Archive: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/archive/
* EL-Announce with LM_NET Select: http://elann.biglist.com/sub/
* LM_NET Supporters: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ven.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------
LM_NET
Mailing List Home