- To: LM_NET@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
- Subject: Re: [LM_NET] HIT: Carolyn Haywood to weed or not to weed
- From: Julia Colvin <colvin@AAPS.K12.MI.US>
- Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 12:19:51 -0500
- Comments: To: MARY KATE CULLINAN CULLINAN <CULLINANMA@EDU.ELIZABETH.K12.NJ.US>
- In-Reply-To: <s3a912a9.076@grpwise6.eboe>
- References: <s3a912a9.076@grpwise6.eboe>
- Reply-To: Julia Colvin <colvin@AAPS.K12.MI.US>
- Sender: School Library Media & Network Communications <LM_NET@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>
I remember weeding a large collection of her books, finding one in
which someone says of Betsy or Billy's new puppy, "It's a b -- h!"
--Anne
On Dec 21, 2005, at 8:30 AM, MARY KATE CULLINAN CULLINAN wrote:
> Everyone,
>
> Thanks for all of your imput! Since I posted I have had 2 kids check
> out her books so I'm going to wait and see if more books go out this
> year. Here is my original question and all the responses.
>
>
>
>> Hello Everyone,
>>
>> I'm thinking about weeding all the Carolyn Haywood books in my K-5
>> collection. They seem so "dated" but I don't have a lot of money to
>> immediately replace the books with more recent ones. Students look
>> at the
>> covers and put them back. So does anyone still have these books in
>> your
>> collection?
>>
>
>
>
> But oh they are such good stories - I remember how I enjoyed them. It
> is
> too bad that todays children don't appreciate them - instead they want
> all
> that gory stuff! Of course, this statement dates me! :)
>
> I loved this set when I was growing up and yes it was dated even
> then....
> However if you do decide to let them go, please let me know I am
> trying to
> collect the whole set.
>
> Have some. Nancy Drew lovers seem to check them out a few times a
> year. I have not thought to remove them yet.
>
> I got rid of the really ratty ones and replaced the
> ones that were still IP. The first grade teacher here
> still reads them aloud. and there is a demand for them
> from students in grades 1-2-3.
>
> I have them but just got in new printings of them with more up to date
> covers. The kids are loving them.
>
> I still have them, but they don't circulate much (if ever).
>
> We still have some of them. We can generally get the kids to read
> "Snowbound with Betsy," but that's about it. I'd be anxious to hear
> what
> others say.
>
> I do and I have them on the shelves for the very same reason... can't
> replace them, but they are ugly to look at. They even have that old
> library smell too.
>
> I have those books in my K-5 collection as well. They don't circulate
> well, but circulate occassionally just because they are AR. If you
> get any responses on this topic, I would love to know.
>
> I think your thoughts are ones many of us have had. Last year, I did
> weed duplicate copies and books with faded covers. However, I still
> have several on the shelf because they meet the need of high level
> first grade readers who are clamoring for a chapter book. We know
> that there will not be objectionable material in them. Would be
> interested in what others have done.
>
> I started pulling these when I started in libraries seven years ago.
> They were dated when I read them as a child. The teacher that leaves
> work when she gets married wasn't a reality in the early 70s. Even if
> I don't have money to replace the titles, having books that turn
> students off from reading, in my mind is worse than not having enough
> books.
>
> I still have them in my K-3 collection, but was
> considering withdrawal because my kids won't check
> them out, either.
>
> My sister taught third grade five years ago, and she
> read one or two of Carolyn Haywood's books to her
> class, sparking an interest in those books in the
> school library. The librarian was thrilled to see the
> books checked out again because she didn't want to
> weed them. Do you think you could enlist an ally
> among the third grade teachers to do the same?
> Those books were dated when I read them in the 70s but
> I really liked them. My personal opinion is don't
> weed them!
>
> I had both the betsy and Eddie books. Every year I would read B is for
> Betsy to the first grade. We would discuss that Betsy went to school
> at the same time as my mother and some of their grandparents. They
> absolutely loved Betsy. They took her out a lot. However I did not do
> the same with the Eddie books and they were not as popular. Also the
> first 3 Betsy books have been republished in the last 5 years or so.
> Give it a little publicity and see what happens. If nothing, them
> discard
>
> I only have How the Reindeer saved Santa which is checked out currently
> and her book of selected Halloween stories.
>
> Ugh! Heavens no! For precisely the reason you witnessed.
>
> My Haywood (and Lovelace) books are as old as the hills but every
> couple of
> years, I get a girl (usually a great reader) who reads through the
> whole
> series. I think they might circulate more if I invested in an updated
> set. I
> wouldn't throw mine out, but if yours truly haven't circulated in
> many years, you
> might consider it.
>
> I have a couple. I do like her Christmas Fantasy and Santa Claus
> Forever, but the novels are never checked out. I should pitch them,
> too.
>
> Hi,
> "I hear you." I loved the Betsy books growing up (they were probably
> NEW
> then!) and got desparate enough now and then to read one of the Eddie
> ones.
> When I started, our library had most of both series plus a few others.
> But,
> little by little, I have weeded most of them out except for her
> collection
> of Halloween stories called "Halloween Treats" and maybe the original
> Betsy
> book (I'm home and can't check.) But they weren't being borrowed (and
> I
> wasn't promoting them) and, literally, the shelves in that section
> were full
> and there just wasn't any room. Besides, I'm hoping our local library
> (which is in a small town) still has them or can get them through
> interlibrary loan. I know, maybe more than a few years ago, they were
> reissued with different covers but the same pictures inside. I wonder
> if
> those circulate. I'll be curious to hear the responses you get.
>
> I just pulled them all on Monday!!!!!!! The stories are great, but
> they are so old, the books are worn out and the
> covers so old fashioned. I gave them all to a fifth grade teacher. I
> worked at another school in my district last year and weeded them
> because no one read them. I hope this helps.
>
> oh, I've been having this debate myself for years! I LOVED the Betsy
> books
> when I was a kid...but I've only seen one circulate in the past five
> years...we may just have to bite the bullet...
>
> I weeded mine several years ago. No one had checked them out in quite
> awhile. I reread one, but it was very dated, and I knew I couldn't
> comfortably recommend it to anyone.
>
> I weeded mine several years ago and no one ever missed them. They
> never circulated, the pictures, while quaint, are dated and in black
> and white which didn't appeal to the students. Even though you won't
> be replacing them right away, you will have the shelf space for new
> books when you do!
>
> These books were just recently re-released with shiny new read
> covers--there has been a renewal of interest in these "old-fashioned"
> authors, like Maud Hart Lovelace, Elizabeth Enright, Eleanor Estes,
> and yes, Haywood as well. I suspect that what the students are
> responding to are the outdated covers more than the actual content. I
> don't know how to get around that (except maybe by "hand-selling"
> them) and I don't know if that really answers your question about
> whether or not to weed them. They might be a good choice for students
> from more conservative families especially.
> I love her books and was going to ask you if you would sell them to me
> if you decide to weed them. I didn't know there would be any
> controversy. I'll be interested in reading the responses.
>
> If you decide to weed I would be happy to pay for the shipping to get
> them.
> They were a childhood favorite of mine and I would love to won them.
> Since
> I grew up in the 50's, yes they probably are dated. However, I do
> think at
> least one has recently been reissued. You might want to check and see
> if
> any of the titles are still in print.
>
> We do, but they haven't circulated much. You could replace them with
> Boxcar
> Children books, perhaps.
>
>
>
> Mary Kate Cullinan
> Media Specialist
> School No. 12
> 638 Magie Avenue
> Elizabeth, NJ 07208
> (908) 436-5669
> cullinanma@edu.elizabeth.k12.nj.us
>
> **********************************************************************
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
> are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
> the system manager.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
> MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses and inappropriate
> content.
>
> www.clearswift.com
> **********************************************************************
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> Please note: All LM_NET postings are protected by copyright law.
> You can prevent most e-mail filters from deleting LM_NET postings
> by adding LM_NET@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU to your e-mail address book.
> To change your LM_NET status, e-mail to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu
> In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL
> 3) SET LM_NET MAIL 4) SET LM_NET DIGEST * Allow for confirmation.
> * LM_NET Help & Information: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/
> * LM_NET Archive: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/archive/
> * EL-Announce with LM_NET Select: http://elann.biglist.com/sub/
> * LM_NET Supporters: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ven.html
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
Julia Anne Colvin, Librarian
Scarlett Middle School
Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
colvin@aaps.k12.mi.us
http://SCA-AColvin.aaps.site.eboard.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Please note: All LM_NET postings are protected by copyright law.
You can prevent most e-mail filters from deleting LM_NET postings
by adding LM_NET@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU to your e-mail address book.
To change your LM_NET status, e-mail to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu
In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL
3) SET LM_NET MAIL 4) SET LM_NET DIGEST * Allow for confirmation.
* LM_NET Help & Information: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/
* LM_NET Archive: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/archive/
* EL-Announce with LM_NET Select: http://elann.biglist.com/sub/
* LM_NET Supporters: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ven.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------
LM_NET
Mailing List Home