CROSSROADS

Introduction to the Middle School Curriculum


The middle level CROSSROADS curriculum is the collaborative product of the entire middle school social studies department at Niskayuna School District. The goal of these units of instruction is to translate the work of Project Historian Richard B. Bernstein into materials that will promote successful classroom instruction in grades seven and eight. The department prepared for this curriculum project throughout the 1992-93 school year. In meetings with the project historian, as well as members of the elementary, high school, and college teams, teachers began to think about historical periods in terms of how best to teach them to middle level students. Several separate department meetings were also held at which teachers examined the task and prepared for the activities of the summer. During six weeks of the summer of 1993, the first draft of the curriculum was written by teachers working in teams. Field testing took place during the 1993-94 school year in both middle schools in the Niskayuna district as well as by teachers in Burnt Hills (New York) and two schools in Ohio. Revisions based on field testing and reviews by the project's Advisory Board led to a second draft written in the summer of 1994 and field tested in the 1994-95 school year. The following document contains those revisions which responded to the second year of field testing.


Elements of Good Middle School Curriculum:
Prior to beginning the actual curriculum writing project, the department agreed upon several principles that would guide writing teams. They believe that each of the following elements are necessary for successful middle level curriculum:

    1. Curriculum should be written at an appropriate but challenging developmental level. The concepts and lessons are aimed at students in the late concrete operational or early formal operational stages. In addition, wherever possible lessons and activities were written to develop upper level thinking skills; for instance, students are called upon to analyze events, rank them in importance, and defend their decisions. Emphasis is also placed on taking advantage of middle level students' social and personal interests; for instance, several lessons focus on what life was like during a certain period of time or how historical events affected the individuals or the groups involved in them.

    2. Curriculum should be appropriate for heterogeneously grouped classrooms. Most of the literature about middle level education suggests that students should be grouped heterogeneously in classrooms, and that within those classes students might be grouped and regrouped as is most appropriate for the lesson and student ability. The curriculum provides activities that students of various levels of ability and interest can find both challenging and rewarding. A variety of methodologies are suggested, and whole class, independent, and cooperative group instruction are all incorporated into the curriculum. While many of the activities culminate in some form of written work (essays, letters to the editor, journal entries), others include working on maps, drawing political cartoons, creating collages, and other methods of expressing understanding of key concepts.

    3. Curriculum should provide students with opportunities to act as an historian. Throughout the curriculum hundreds of primary sources (such as constitutional documents, personal accounts of events, and even period advertisements) have been reproduced. Students can be engaged in the work of an historian; for instance, they can perceive past events as they were experienced at the time and appreciate the interplay of change and continuity. Teachers may have to help students decipher the more difficult passages, but it is important that every student participates in viewing the past through primary source materials.

    4. Curriculum should integrate skills development with content. The curriculum emphasizes the skills of research and writing, and lessons requiring both are found in every unit. Students are called upon to gather information from many resources and write cogently about what they have learned. However, lessons are also included that require students to interpret political cartoons, give oral reports, and make use of several other skills typically taught to middle school students. Importantly, no skill is taught in a vacuum; the concept taught is matched as closely as possible to the skills used as a vehicle for teaching that concept.

    5. Curriculum should provide opportunities for authentic assessment of instruction. In each unit at least one lesson culminates with an activity for which a grading rubric is provided, referred to in the curriculum as assessment criteria. Each of these is an integral part of the unit, so that the assessment is part of the learning process. While quizzes or tests could be added to this curriculum by an individual teacher, none are included in the curriculum.

    6. Curriculum should be relevant, interesting, and engaging. A variety of activities and methodologies are included in every unit; every student should be able to find something he or she really enjoys. Many lessons ask students to play roles or assume a position to better understand the views of historical individuals or groups. Personalizing social history helps students feel more involved with history.


Organization of the Curriculum:
Each of the twelve instructional units is organized in the same way to aid teachers in using it to develop their lessons.


Conclusion:
The middle level CROSSROADS curriculum represents three years of preparation, writing, field testing and revision by the middle school social studies teachers at Niskayuna School District. They have combined the knowledge of history shared with them by Project Historian Richard B. Bernstein with their own knowledge of middle level instruction to develop a curriculum that they believe represents the best of both. This curriculum is the product of the efforts of the following teachers from Niskayuna's two middle schools:

Iroquois School Van Antwerp School
Donna Cavallaro Susan Burke
Donna Cavallaro Patricia Hamilton
Holly DelAquilla Dennis Frank
Henry Mueller (Department Coordinator) Charline Hoffman
Karen Polsinelli Raymond LeBel
Stephanie Schechter

Back to Table of Contents