Date: May 1994
Grade Level(s): 9, 10, 11, 12
Subject(s):
Overview: Should the town of Twin Cheeks ban motorized rentals on Thome Lake? Students will explore the political, personal, and economic issues involved in making this decision as they assume different roles in this simulation.
Purpose: Students are to use discussion, negotiation, and political skill to make a group decision.
Objectives:
1. Students will understand the political and economic situation of the simulation town.
2. Students will successfully assume the roles of particular individuals from the simulation.
3. Students will develop and write a detailed statement of their characters' identities, as appropriate for the simulation.
4. Students will organize and stage a town meeting to consider the proposed law.
5. Students will participate in the town meeting discussion, negotiations, and decision-making.
Resources/Materials: Handouts A, B, C
Handout A:
Handout B:
Handout C:
Activities and Procedures:
Day One
Students are read Handout A. The teacher leads the class in a whole-group brainstorm of what the town is like. The description of the town is fleshed-out with particular emphasis on what issues might confront its citizens.
Students are read Handout B. The discussion focuses on what arguments might be made in favor and against the law.
Students are given their own copies of Handouts A, B, and C, and each is given a particular role. Students are assigned to write a 200 word description of their role's background, needs and arguments for or against the proposed law.
Day Two
Students are assigned to groups of six or smaller for small-group town meetings, with each group having only one person from each role. Each group has appointed a discussion leader and a recorder. Other than that, each member has one vote at the time any vote is taken. The recorder will record the names of each participant and any formal actions the group takes. The recorder does not need to record discussion.
If, as the teacher monitors individual group progress, it seems that the groups will "finish" early in the period, the teacher will give the town meetings a time limit, and reassign participants to new groups attempting to group "powerful" people together and quieter people together. Again, however, each group has only one person from each role in it. Leaders and recorders are again appointed.
The last third of the period is given a two-minute warning and then recorders make their reports: What actions were taken.
The teacher leads the class in discussion of the process they have just completed. How were decisions made? What were individual feelings as their meetings progressed? Did they feel their rights or needs were respected? In particular, did the majority respect the needs of the minority; did the minority disrupt the action of the majority? What influence did a person's own experience and orientation have on his or her role in the simulation: Was each able to successfully take on the role of another?
Additional Activities: Students will either:
1. Write a set of discussion guidelines for another group simulation which would be more democratic and efficient than the process they participated in.2. Find at least one local issue which has vested roles and explain the issue and at least four of the vested interests.
Adapted by Tim Oliver from Government in America (Houghton Mifflin)